"Returning astronauts safely to the moon through NASA's public-private partnership model requires an unprejudiced procurement process alongside sound policy that incorporates redundant systems and promotes competition. "Our lawsuit with the Court of Federal Claims highlighted the important safety issues with the Human Landing System procurement process that must still be addressed," a Blue Origin spokesperson said in an email to CNET. The GAO later found that NASA hadn't done anything wrong in selecting SpaceX over Blue Origin and a third bidder, Dynetics. Blue Origins civil lawsuit was first filed in federal court last month, but it was filed as a sealed complaint, now a judge has ordered its public release. Heres his take on the report, shortly after its release to selected. While the proposed milestone payments are redacted, the court notes that Blue Origins lunar lander proposal asked for more than triple the 345 million that. The decision against Blue Origin follows a protest filed with the US Government Accountability Office earlier this year. Among the first to see the redacted version of Special Counsel Robert Muellers. The release of a redacted version of the judges opinion will be discussed at a meeting on November. The ruling will go through the same process, in which the parties involved propose redactions before it's made public. The lawsuit was filed in August in federal claims court. Hertling granted the federal government’s motion to dismiss the case and gave Blue Origin and the government until November 18 to. The lawsuit was originally filed under seal to protect trade secrets and later released in redacted form. A federal judge today rejected Blue Origin’s challenge to a 2. In a one-page ruling, Court of Federal Claims Judge Richard A. The full opinion by Judge Richard Hertling explaining his decision hasn't yet been publicly released.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |